Wednesday, July 19, 2017

RCI SKANDAL FOREX TERIMA PERKENAN AGONG ... BACA NOTA KE EMPAT

Berita gembira untuk rakyat Malaysia...


Bidang kuasa suruhanjaya itu adalah: 
 
i. menentukan kesahihan dakwaan mengenai kerugian akibat urus niaga pertukaran mata wang asing yang dialami BNM sekitar tahun 1990-an serta implikasinya kepada ekonomi negara. 
 
ii. menentukan sama ada penglibatan BNM dalam aktiviti urus niaga mata wang asing yang menyebabkan kerugian tersebut adalah bertentangan dengan Ordinan Bank Pusat 1958 atau mana-mana undang-undang yang berkaitan. 
 
iii. Menentukan sama ada terdapat elemen menyembunyikan fakta dan maklumat sebenar berhubung kerugian BNM dalam aktiviti urus niaga mata wang asing itu dan memberikan kenyataan yang mengelirukan kepada Jemaah Menteri, Parlimen dan rakyat. 
 
iv. Mengesyorkan tindakan yang sesuai untuk diambil terhadap pihak-pihak yang terlibat secara langsung dan/atau tidak langsung jika didapati mereka menyebabkan kerugian BNM serta menyembunyikan fakta dan maklumat sebenar berhubung kerugian itu; dan 
 
v. Mengesyorkan langkah-langkah bagi memastikan perkara yang sama tidak berulang. 
 
Kepada Dr Mahathir dan kuncu-kuncunya, baca Nota ke-iv dengan hati terbuka!

Tuesday, July 18, 2017

TAN SRI ANNUAR MUSA : APABILA DAP MEMBUNUH DENGAN PISAU YANG DIPINJAM


Seringkali kedengaran di kalangan rakyat yang Melayu kini berpecah-belah dan kini berpecah lagi setelah Dr Mahathir menubuhkan PPBM setelah gagal dengan rancangan untuk menghilangkan sokongan ahli-ahli UMNO terhadap Presidennya Datuk Seri Najib Razak. Plan A ini telah mendapat sekutu baru Dr Mahathir dari DAP.

Apa pun di pengakhirannya, matlamat DAP adalah ingin melihat perpecahan yang lebih besar ke atas bangsa Melayu dan umat Islam, maka mereka melaksanakan strategi perang yang terkandung di dalam 'The Art of War (Sun Tzu) iaitu ... MEMBUNUH DENGAN PISAU YANG DIPINJAM, KEPUNG WEI UNTUK SELAMATKAN ZHAO, PERDAYA LANGIT UNTUK MELEWATI SAMUDERA. Ini adalah strategi perang yang sangat licik dan benar-benar dihayati DAP.

Demikian adalah amaran dan peringatan Tan Sri Annuar Musa (TSAM) kepada kita semua terutamanya ahli-ahli UMNO.

Setelah gagal menghancurkan UMNO, DAP dapat menyaksikan perpecahan Melayu yang teruk di kalangan blok pembangkang. Manakan tidak, sokongan kepada PAS telah terbahagi dua setelah PAN diwujudkan. PKR pula sedang berhadapan dengan perebutan kuasa di antara kartel Azmin dan penyokong Wan Azizah.

Lebih mengerikan apabila parti politik yang baru ditubuhkan Dr Mahathir mengalami perpecahan yang sangat parah di antara kem Dr Mahathir dan Muhyiddin apabila menyaksikan ahli-ahli mereka keluar parti beramai-ramai dan ada di antara negeri di Semenanjung yang hampir lumpuh seperti di Perak dan Negeri Sembilan.

Setelah mengetahui yang politik melayu di dalam Pakatan Harapan (PH) berpecah parah, DAP menggunakan perpecahan parti ciptaannya sendiri di kalangan PKR, PAN dan PPBM sebagai ramuan untuk memecahbelahkan bangsa Melayu dan Islam.

Maka dibiarkan saja pengumuman barisan kepimpinan tertinggi PH di mana Anwar Ibrahim yang masih dipenjarakan sebagai Ketua De factonya, Dr Mahahtir sebagai Pengerusi dan Wan Azizah sebagai Presiden manakala DAP hanya diwakili Guan Eng di kedudukan Naib Presiden dan M Kulasegaran mengawal kantong duit PH.

Tidakkah kita merasa pelik apabila DAP yang mempunyai kerusi parlimen terbanyak di antara parti-parti lain tetapi hanya diberikan jawatan Naib Presiden? Apakah Kit Siang benar-benar berpuas hati dengan jawatan yang diberikan kepada DAP?

Menurut TSAM, mengetahui yang Anwar Ibrahim akan kekal di dalam penjara sehingga tamat PRU14 dan tiada ruang untuk Anwar dibebaskan lebih awal. Manakala Wan Azizah pula seorang pemimpin yang tidak berwibawa dan boleh dijadikan boneka terbaik mereka, maka dengan ini kedudukan Guan Eng sebagai Naib Presiden adalah mantap dan tidak mustahil, Guan Eng akan akhirnya terpilih menggantikan Anwar.

Dengan keyakinan undi Cina terutamanya di bandar-bandar berpihak kepada DAP dan hampir kesemua kerusi parlimen di bandar-bandar diisi DAP, maka sekali lagi DAP akan mendapat kerusi terbanyak di PRU14 nanti. Dengan kedudukan Anwar sebagai ketua de facto yang agak goyah, Guan Eng adalah calon terbaik menggantikannya, maka apakah DAP akhirnya tidak berkuasa sepenuhnya ke atas parti-parti Melayu di dalam PH?

Jika blok pembangkang berjaya menawan Putrajaya, apakah DAP tidak berkemungkinan menjadi Perdana Menterinya?

Inilah yang dikatakan TSAM bagaimana DAP .... MEMBUNUH DENGAN PISAU YANG DIPINJAM yang akhirnya di dalam apa jua keadaan Pakatan Harapan tetap dalam genggaman DAP. Setelah PKR, PPBM dan PAN berjaya diperalatkan, maka segala dasar DAP akan dapat dilaksanakan nanti juga.

Walaupun DAP dan Kit Siang licik berpolitik walaupun di kalangan rakan-rakannya, namun Tan Sri Annuar Musa dan UMNO telah mampu membaca setiap langkah mereka. Terpulanglah kepada pengundi yang lain untuk menghadam peringtan TSAM ini dan ia tidak mustahil untuk berlaku sekiranya blok pembangkang diberi peluang pada pilihanraya akan datang. AWAS!!!

Wednesday, July 12, 2017

UBER DAN TEKSI BEKERJASAMA AKHIRNYA


Pada Julai tahun lalu, sibuk dipersoalkan seolah-olah ada perjanjian 'senyap' syarikat teksi dan Uber walaupun menerima bantahan pemandu teksi. Persatuan dan Syarikat-syarikat Teksi Semenanjun Malaysia (GPST) dikatakan telah menandatangani memorandum persefahaman sehingga menafikan sebarang pintu perbincangan dengan pemandu.

Justeru, lebih 200 pemandu teksi berhimpun di Parlimen membantah Uber dan Grab dan mendakwa yang 3 memorandum mereka kepada Perdana Menteri, tidak terjawab. Bantahan itu dibuat berikutan undang-undang berkaitan perkhidmatan perkongsian kenderaan di bawah Akta Pengangkutan Awam Darat 2010 (Akta 714) dan Akta Lembaga Pelesenan Kenderaan Perdagangan 1987 (Akta 334), yang dijangka dibentangkan nanti.

Itulah gelagat mereka yang sekadar ingin membantah sahaja tanpa ada apa-apa tindakan yang mampu perbaiki nasib mereka sendiri.

Namun, kini telah termeterai secara rasmi di antara Uber dan Gabungan Persatuan dan Syarikat-Syarikat Teksi Semenanjung Malaysia kerjasama di dalam program perintis mereka untuk membenarkan pemandu-pemandu teksi Gabungan memandu di rangkaian Uber dengan kenderaan teksi mereka sendiri.

Bagi mereka yang hanya tahu membantah, kerjasama Uber-Teksi ini akan mampu menambahkan pendapatan pemandu-pemandu teksi dan sekali gus penumpang akan berasa berbaloi. Bagaimana? Selama ini pemandu teksi terpaksa berbaris menunggu pelanggan yang tidak pasti tetapi dengan teknologi yang telah diperkenalkan Uber sejak 3 tahun lalu, penumpang telah sediada dan destinasi juga telah dipastikan.

Untuk penumpang pula, bukan saja ketepatan waktu yang akan dinikmati, malahan destinasi juga telah ditentukan. Paling penting yang dapat dimanfaatkan penumpang adalah tambang yang telah ditetapkan dan dipersetujui oleh kedua-dua pihak di antara penumpang dan pemandu.

Walaubagaimanapun, di dalam percubaan program perintis ini, hanya 500 pemandu teksi yang terbaik di mana diambil kira kenderaan mereka juga perlu dalam keadaan yang terbaik akan terpilih. Selain dari itu, mereka perlu mempunyai lesen memandu dan mereka perlu melepasi saringan Uber seperti maklumat insuran dan kenderaan tidak melebihi dari jangkahayat 5 tahun.

Program perintis ini terbuka kepada semua jenis kenderaan termasuk MPV dan sedan. Setiap kadar tambang akan ditentukan dari UberX. Mereka juga dibenarkan mengambil penumpang lain sekiranya tidak berada di dalam aplikasi Uber. Satu aplikasi khas akan diwujudkan oleh Uber iaitu 'UberTaxi' dan penumpang boleh memilih untuk membayar secara tunai, kad kredit ataupun talian yang disediakan Uber.

Uber adalah sebuah syarikat yang menawarkan perkhidmatan pengangkutan teksi sejak 2010 dengan menggunakan aplikasi telefon dan sejak dilancarkan pada tahun 2014 di Malaysia, Uber kini telah berada di bandar-bandar utama seperti Alor Setar, Ipoh, Johor Bahru, Kota Kinabalu, Kuala Lumpur, Kuantan, Kuching, Langkawi, Melaka, Miri, Pulau Pinang dan Seremban.

Manakala Gabungan Persatuan dan Syarikat-Syarikat Teksi Semenanjung Malaysia atau lebih dikenali sebagai GABUNGAN ialah Persatuan untuk syarikat teksi dan persatuan teksi di Semenanjung Malaysia yang terdiri daripada 90% teksi berlesen terdiri daripada lebih daripada 28,000 unit teksi.

Oleh itu tidak ada sebab mengapa kerjasama Uber-Teksi ini perlu dibantah sedangkan ia mampu memperbaiki pendapatan pemandu teksi. Pada masa yang sama, prestasi dan imej industri teksi juga akan mampu diperbaiki malahan dengan syarat-syarat dari Uber pasti akan dipatuhi untuk menjaga keselesaan dan keselamatan penumpang. 

Apakah ini bukan satu lagi kerjasama pintar yang sentiasa diusahakan pihak SPAD bagi memastikan industri teksi terus kekal malahan dapat diperbaiki sehingga mampu melenyapkan persepsi dunia yang selama ini melabelkan perkhidmatan teksi di negara kita adalah yang terburuk di dunia?

 

Tuesday, July 11, 2017

DAP GAGAL PATUH PERLEMBAGAAN, SILA SALAHKAN DIRI SENDIRI



Keputusan RoS tidak membatalkan pendaftaran DAP sangat menghampakan mereka kerana itulah yang dikempen Kit Siang dan DAP selama ini. Alasan dalam ceramah mereka mudah untuk meraih simpati justeru boleh menghasut rakyat untuk terus membenci kerajaan Barisan Nasional. Mereka juga dengan mudah akan menuduh PM Najib mengguna taktik jahat menghalang DAP bertanding pada pilihanraya akan datang.

Sepertimana arahan DS Zahid Hamidi Timbalan Perdana Menteri merangkap Menteri Dalam Negeri, apa pun keputusan RoS perlu profesional dan tidak menyalahi perlembagaan DAP. Maka RoS tidak membatalkan pendaftaran DAP tetapi berbalik kepada apa yang mereka sendiri telah gagal mematuhi perlembagaan parti.

Pemilihan semula CEC pada 2013 juga didapati tidak dilakukan mengikut perlembagaan parti dan sepatutnya DAP mengadakan pemilihan CECnya pada tahun 2016 memandangkan tempoh penggal telah tamat. Ini bermakna tempoh layak Guan Eng sebagai Setiausaha Agong juga sepatutnya tamat. Namun, DAP menangguhkan pemilihan CEC parti selama lebih 18 bulan.

Mungkin ramai yang tidak tahu bahawa RoS telah pun beri peluang kepada DAP untuk tempoh 3 tahun lagi dan Guan Eng terus menjadi Setiausaha Agong dari 2013. Tempoh ini adalah untuk Guan Eng perbetulkan kesilapan pemilihan CEC yang telah silap untuk kali kedua. Namun ianya dianggap oleh DAP sbg nasihat sahaja.

Baru sekarang ROS umumkan secara umum. Sememmangnya benar yang pemakluman itu dilakukan kerana PRU14 akan hampir tetapi RoS tidak melakukannya untuk bermain politik sebagaimana yang selalu didakwa Kit Siang dan DAP. Ia adalah untuk kebaikan DAP dan calon-calon mereka.

Untuk pengetahuan, setiap calon yang akan bertanding mewakili parti politik perlu mendapat watikah kelulusan dari partinya dan watikah ini akan dikeluarkan oleh Setiausaha Agong. Apabila CEC DAP tidak diiktiraf RoS kerana melanggar perlembagaan partinya sendiri, apakah Guan Eng sah untuk memegang jawatan Setiausaha Agong untuk keluarkan watikah dan apakah calon-calon DAP boleh bertanding dengan logo roket?

RoS sememangnya bertindak profesional kerana memberi peringatan kepada DAP dan sekali gus cuba selamatkan calon-calon DAP daripada dibatalkan kemenangan mereka nanti. Cuma sekarang Guan Eng dan CEC lama yang enggan mengikut arahan RoS untuk mengadakan pemilihan CEC yang baru. Apakah Guan Eng dan Kit Siang sedang tergugat jika diadakan pemilihan CEC dalam masa terdekat?

Seharusnya ahli-ahli DAP mendesak Guan Eng untuk diadakan pemilihan CEC setelah ditangguh selama 18 bulan demi selamatkan calon-calon mereka.  Jangan dibenarkan Guan Eng dan kuncu-kuncunya terus-terusan bermain politik dan salahkan RoS dan juga parti pemerintah Barisan Nasional. Sedangkan RoS tidak membatalkan pun pendaftaran DAP.

Jika Guan Eng dan Kit Siang ada keyakinan yang mereka masih kuat berpengaruh dan diperlukan di dalam DAP, tidaka ada apa sebab mereka perlu beri alasan untuk tidak mengikut arahan RoS melainkan jika mereka sebenarnya ingin DAP hancur nanti. Jika ia berlaku, Guan Eng perlu bertanggungjawab dan dipersalahkan kerana sengaja melanggar perlembagaan parti DAP untuk kepentingan peribadinya.

Fahamkan kenyataan rasmi RoS ini;
07 JULAI 2017
PUTRAJAYA

Saya merujuk kepada kenyataan-kenyataan yang diberikan oleh beberapa orang pemimpin DAP mengenai status pemilihan semula Jawatankuasa Tertinggi Pusat (CEC) DAP yang telah diadakan pada 29 September 2013 dan juga kenyataan yang telah diberikan oleh YAB Timbalan Perdana Menteri, merangkap Menteri Dalam Negeri pada 3 Julai 2017, yang menyebut bahawa beliau akan mengadakan pertemuan dengan Pendaftar Pertubuhan berhubung dengan isu yang dibangkitkan tersebut.

Dalam hal ini, saya telah mengadakan perjumpaan dan perbincangan dengan YAB Timbalan Perdana Menteri merangkap Menteri Dalam Negeri dan beliau telah menyarankan supaya apa juga tindakan yang diambil oleh pihak Jabatan Pendaftaran Pertubuhan Malaysia (JPPM), hendaklah berlandaskan kepada Akta Pertubuhan 1966 dan perlembagaan Parti DAP itu sendiri.

Ingin ditegaskan di sini bahawa pihak JPPM menganggap bahawa Parti DAP sebagai sebuah parti yang sah di sisi undang-undang dan setakat ini pihak JPPM tidak berniat sama sekali untuk membatalkan Parti DAP. Bersabit dengan aduan-aduan yang dibuat oleh ahli-ahli DAP sendiri yang tidak berpuas hati dengan kepincangan terhadap proses-proses pemilihan semula CEC DAP yang dijalankan pada 29 September 2013, pihak JPPM berpendirian bahawa pelantikan anggota CEC serta pemegang jawatan utama melalui pemilihan semula ini, adalah tidak sah dari segi undang-undang. Pemilihan semula yang diadakan tersebut sepatutnya berdasarkan kepada senarai nama perwakilan yang berhak hadir dan mengundi pada pemilihan CEC DAP bertarikh 15hb Disember 2012 iaitu yang melibatkan seramai 2576 perwakilan dari 865 buah cawangan.

Justeru, JPPM mengambil pendirian supaya pihak Parti DAP perlu mengadakan sekali lagi pemilihan semula CEC yang baharu yang sah dan telus bagi membolehkan para perwakilan memilih 20 orang anggota CEC yang sah dan diiktiraf. Hanya anggota CEC yang sah dan diiktiraf sahaja boleh melantik pemegang jawatan utama yang sah dan diiktiraf mengikut Akta Pertubuhan 1966 dan Perlembagaan Parti DAP. Ini amat penting di sisi undang-undang memandangkan pelantikan bagi jawatan utama parti mempunyai peranan yang penting sebagai wakil parti yang mempunyai autoriti untuk menandatangani watikah pelantikan calon untuk mewakili parti dalam pilihanraya yang diiktiraf oleh Suruhanjaya Pilihanraya.

Sehubungan dengan itu, JPPM ingin menegaskan bahawa arahan akan dikeluarkan kepada pihak DAP supaya mengadakan pemilihan semula CEC yang
baharu untuk memilih 20 orang anggota yang sah, berpandukan kepada Akta Pertubuhan 1966 dan Perlembagaan Parti DAP untuk membolehkan pemilihan ini diiktiraf oleh JPPM.

#TAMAT#

Jabatan Pendaftaran Pertubuhan Malaysia (JPPM)
Kementerian Dalam Negeri
7 Julai 2017

Monday, July 10, 2017

MCA : DRAMA AIRMATA KIT SIANG DAN DAP BERULANG DALAM KISAH ROS BATALKAN CEC


Bukan sukar untuk MCA mengesan taktik drama airmata Kit Siang dan DAP apabila kononnya kecewa yang parti itu bakal dibatalkan dan justeru tidak akan bertanding di PRU14 nanti. Itulah juga taktik yang sama digunakan Kit Siang dan DAP setiap kali pilihanraya umum akan tiba dan setiap kali itu juga mereka akan menggunakan taktik yang sama untuk menghentam Barisan Nasional (BN) dan Suruhanjaya Pilihanraya (SPR).

Justeru, pesanan untuk Kit Siang dan DAP dari MCA ... Jika kalian tidak bosan menggunakan taktik yang sama, rakyat pula sudah tersangat bosan!

MCA mengetahui yang DAP akan menggunakan taktik 'Mula-mula menangis, kemudian menunjukkan rasa tidak puas hati dan seterusnya memohon simpati. Inilah Prosedur Operasi Standard (SOP) mereka dan akan mengulanginya seperti sebuah skrip drama untuk kempen pilihanraya.

Pada PRU13 lalu, MCA telah dimaklumkan yang pemilihan semula CEC adalah hasil dari 'cut and paste' keputusan pemilihan yang dibatalkan sebelumnya. Ketika inilah juga, ahli-ahli DAP sendiri yang membuat aduan kepada RoS. Memandangan PRU13 hampir tiba, Kit Siang dan pemimpin DAP yang lain menggunakan peluang yang terbaik untuk menagih simpati.

Mereka mendakwa yang oleh kerana terdapatnya taktik kotor dari pihak lawan untuk menganiaya mereka, berkemungkinan mereka tidak akan bertanding di bawah logo DAP dan terpaksa mengguna samada logo PAS atau PKR. Tetapi apa yang berlaku kemudiannya? Segala tuduhan dan dakwaan tidak berlaku dan logo DAP kekal digunakan.

Apabila baru-baru ini Setiausaha Media Perdana Menteri menasihatkan Kit Siang dan DAP agar tidak campur hal ehwal parti orang lain dan menjaga urusan sendiri, DAP timbulkan pemilihan CEC 2012 sekali lagi. Kit Siang dan kuncu-kuncunya pun mula berlakon walaupun setelah 5 tahun, DAP tetap dengan ulangtayang lakonan lapuk mereka yang kelihatan sangat memualkan.

Malahan Kit Siang juga mengancam jika DAP dibatalkan kelak, pengundi akan membalas kemarahan mereka kepada MCA dan Gerakan. Agak melucukan apabila DAP gagal menyelesaikan masalah sendiri, walaupun dengan menipu keputusan pemilihan semula, mengapa perlu rakyat marahkan MCA dan Gerakan? Apakah Kit Siang terus yakin yang rakyat Malaysia akan terus-terusan mudah ditipu?

Kepada Kit Siang dan DAP, MCA menasihatkan agar berikan tumpuan untuk memperbetulkan kesalahan sendiri di PRU lalu dan mereka tidak perlu risau terhadap pengundi-pengundi Cina yang akan marahkan MCA pula. Kesalahan pemilihan dan pemilihan semula telah pun dibuktikan sendiri oleh ahli-ahli DAP dan ini ternyata, apabila pemimpin-pemimpin CEC DAP sanggup menipu ahli-ahlinya, inikan pula rakyat jelata.

Drama airmata yang menjadi SOP Kit Siang dan DAP sebenarnya tidak lagi laku untuk dimainkan semula.

Saturday, July 08, 2017

GUAN ENG SHOULD ADMONISH HIS FATHER FOR DAP DERESIGRATION FUSS


It is Guan Eng’s daddy Lim Kit Siang, who started to open his mouth in Gelang Patah and babbled that DAP would be revoked by the ROS in no time and shamelessly pointed his finger that it is a dirty tactic attempted by UMNO / BN. That’s exactly what happened if Guan Eng is afraid to tell us all.

Hence, his daddy’s wild accusations ought to be challenged and redressed by PM’s aide Datuk Seri Tengku Sariffuddin Tengku Ahmad. Datuk Tengku was just reminding DAP members that should DAP is banned from using their logo in the coming general election, it is due to their own members’ complaints lodged to ROS. So how is UMNO linked to DAP’s CEC gerrymandering?

DAP leaders claimed that the matter is cleared in court in 2014 when they have agreed to conduct another re-election upon RoS demands. Yet, as clarified by Home Minister Datuk Seri Ahmad Zahid Hamidi in parliament in 2016, RoS found contradictions in the re-election content and the veracity of the documents submitted.

After the re-election, there were claims by some party members that they were denied the right to attend the party congress as delegates.

An important issue that DAP needs to take note and in particular Gobind who tried to dispute Datuk Tengku’s statement, should DAP is convinced that their re-election is recognised, hence their CEC is legal, why would Guan Eng request to meet the Home Minister to hold a closed meeting in the first instance?

Yes, Datuk Tengku has every right to answer and defend every wild and unfounded allegation from anyone and in particular the opposition block as he is one of the chief staff to the Prime Minister. As the government appointed officer, he is carrying his duties and responsibilites to maintain the image and sovereignty of the country in which the Prime Minister is the Head of our nation and elected in a democratic process.

Should DAP or anyone questioned Datuk Tengku’s capacity as the government officials, apparently they are not just anti-establishment but they are those who are sabotaging the country.

Further, is there a need for Kit Siang to tour around the country to gather feedback if he should resign from politics? Instead, why didn’t Kit Siang take this opportunity to explain the reasons behind his own members” protests even after the CEC re-election? Kit Siang’s intention is clear, he needed badly to cover-up his hidden hands in the gerrymandered CEC election and re-election that now calling for sympathy.

Kit Siang and Guan Eng are those who should be held fully responsible if DAP is revoked. That is the actual warning to DAP members. Therefore, DAP members should not buy their crocodile tears. Full Stop!

Let us have a look at the chronology of the DAP CEC elections debacle:

15/12/2012: DAP held its 16th National Congress central executive committee (CEC) elections. After the election, many had expressed their dissatisfaction for not having a single Malay candidate elected into the CEC.
3/1/2012: The DAP’s CEC had been accused of a ‘technical glitch’ in its calculations by some party delegates during the party elections at the 16th DAP National Congress which was held on December 15, 2012.
5/1/2012: DAP admitted its fault saying the error occurred in the preparation of a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet on its re-calculation which pushed (now elected DAP Bukit Bendera MP) Zairil Khir Johari to the 20th position after securing 803 votes from the initial 305 votes.
9/1/2013: Disgruntled DAP members called for the party to hold fresh polls as a need to restore its integrity and public confidence in DAP.
18/4/2013: The Registrar of Societies (RoS) issued a statement saying it did not recognise the party’s CEC due to the dispute surrounding the party elections and may face deregistration should it fail to take steps to resolve the matter within a month.
18/4/2013: DAP secretary-general Lim Guan Eng called for a press conference on the same day and gave RoS until 3 pm the following day to revoke the ‘letter’, failing which it would use Pas and Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) banners to contest in the May 5 general election.
18/4/2013: The Election Commission said DAP can still field its candidates to contest in the election despite the CEC not being recognised by the RoS.
19/4/2013: DAP chairman Chow Kon Yeow said the party would contest under Pas and PKR banners during the election.
12/7/2013: A booklet titled “The Equity Report” over alleged fraud in the CEC election surfaced, written by one, Father Augustus Chen.
25/7/2013: Perak DAP secretary Nga Kor Ming denied claims that the DAP CEC was fraudulent and blamed Barisan Nasional for a creating a ‘smear campaign’ and called the author of the book a coward.
31/7/2013: Lim Guan Eng rejected RoS’ directive to hold a re-election, claiming that the party leadership was unhappy with the decision.
4/8/2013: RoS director-general Datuk Abdul Rahman Othman again urged the DAP to hold fresh elections as its party grassroots demanded so.
12/8/2013: DAP held an emergency meeting in Kuala Lumpur to discuss the directive by RoS for it to hold fresh elections. Lim Guan Eng said it will come up with an action plan over a letter by RoS dated August 7.
15/8/2013: DAP decided to hold re-election in which party chairman Karpal Singh said it will hold a new set of elections to avoid being deregistered by RoS, although the party felt the directive by RoS, does not have sanctity or authority of law.
10/9/2013: Ladang Paroi DAP branch chief David Dass applied for an injunction to stop the special congress scheduled for Sept 29 on grounds that it was illegal to call for a special congress to hold CEC polls.
Dass had argued that the party’s constitution stated a national congress where a minimum 10-week notice is required. For a Special Congress, a mere seven-day notice to delegates is sufficient. DAP had filed a counter suit to strike out the application.
27/9/2013: The Kuala Lumpur High Court dismissed Dass’s application for an injunction, and ruled in favor of DAP. “The court has no jurisdiction in accordance with section 18 (c) of Societies Act 1966. It is up to Registrar of Societies (RoS) to decide whether DAP has complied its directive,” said the High Court judge Rosnaini Saub.

PERINGATAN SERIUS DARI PM NAJIB UNTUK RAKYAT MALAYSIA DALAM PENDIRIAN TERBAHARU U-TURN DR MAHATHIR


Di dalam beratus U-Turn Dr Mahathir untuk pastikan agenda peribadinya mampu mempengaruhi rakyat, menyokong Anwar sebagai calon Perdana Menteri Pakatan Harapan di saat-saat RCI akan memulakan siasatan ke atas kehilangan rizab Bank Negara merupakan kerisauan sebenar yang sedang menghantui Dr Mahathir dan itulah sebab utama mengapa U-Turn ini berlaku.

Demikian adalah mesej utama dan juga peringatan PM Najib Razak kepada rakyat Malaysia. U-turn terbaru Dr Mahathir pada awalnya diperlihat sebagai persediaan Pakatan Harapan terutama Anwar bebas dari hukuman meliwat keduanya namun PM Najib lebih mengetahui motif sebenar.

Peringatan PM Najib adalah benar kerana sebelum ini selama 20 tahun dan malahan beberapa bulan lalu Dr Mahathir tetap kekal dengan pendiriannya yang Anwar tidak bermoral dan mempunyai nafsu keinginan hubungan sesama jenis yang tidak boleh dijadikan penggantinya dan juga Ketua Negara untuk blok pembangkang.

Malahan Dr Mahathir sendiri telah menawarkan dirinya untuk dilantik sebagai Perdana Menteri Pakatan Harapan sehingga menimbul keresahan dan rasa tidak puas hati di kalangan penyokong Anwar dalam PKR. Maka itulah sebabnya ketika Kongres 2017 mereka, di hadapan Dr Mahathir placard yang tertulis Anwar PM ke 7 di angkat beramai-ramai dan Kit Siang juga turut bersama.

Apabila jawatan Perdana Menteri dilihat menjadi rebutan di antara parti-parti Pakatan Harapan dan isu ini mampu pecah-belah di antara penyokong masing-masing, Anwar dari dalam penjara telah menarik diri. Ia juga berlaku setelah Anwar memberi keterangan kepada BNM Forex Task Force. Pada ketika ini jelas yang Anwar tidak berpihak menyokong Dr Mahathir sehingga beliau tidak ingin Dr Mahathir diberi kuasa ekskutif di dalam Pakatan Harapan.

Sokongan Kit Siang terhadap Dr Mahathir untuk dijadikan calon PM dalam PH juga telah dizahirkan apabila beliau bersama-sama Wan Azizah dan barisan pemimpin PKR mengangakat placard. Ia juga berlaku setelah Kit Siang beri keterangan ke atas skandal Forex BNM. Kehendak peribadinya untuk Dr Mahathir  terpaksa diketepikan apabila DAP berhadapan dengan pergolakan di akar umbi terutamanya di Melaka.

DAP juga tidak kurang dilanda kontroversi terutama kepimpinan Guan Eng di Pulau Pinang. Guan Eng yang sedang berhadapan dengan kes rasuah dan salah gunakuasa nampaknya tidak mampu diselamatkan Dr Mahathir. Ditambah lagi skandal projek terowong bawah tanahnya dan isu jualan aset-aset di Pulau Pinang yang terpaksa dilakukannya apabila kewangan negeri semakin menipis untuk menampung kos operasi pentadbirannya yang meningkat berlipat-ganda.

Apa pun alasan yang cuba diberi Dr Mahathir ke atas sokongan U-Turnnya terhadap Anwar, PM Najib telah mampu mengesan niat sebenar disebalik sokongan yang tidak ikhlas tersebut iaitu his RCI panic. PM Najib juga berpesan kepada Anwar sekiranya beliau akan dengan mudah tunduk dan terpedaya dengan U-Turn Mahathir tetapi tidak pada rakyat yang bukan sewenang-wenangnya mudah untuk ditipu dan diperdaya.

Akhir sekali, PM Najib berpesan;

"This time we will not let him succeed, because democratic process must prevail, and the interests of the country must come before Mahathir’s family.

Nothing is more important than the needs of the people. So the government under my leadership will continue to focus unwaveringly on the economic welfare, social wellbeing and security of all Malaysians. Their interests must always come first, and we will deliver on our promises."

Friday, July 07, 2017

MEMILIH HUSAM, EMPAT KALI KIT SIANG BERMAIN WAYANG DENGAN PENGUNDI CINA


Walaupun DAP dan PAS telah umumkan untuk memutuskan hubungan kerjasama politik dan menubuhkan PAN dari serpihan PAS, MCA mengingatkan yang Presiden PAN Mat Sabu kekal dengan kenyataannya bahawa ... "hukum hudud akan membawa kesejahteraan kerana mampu selesaikan segala masalah kemanusiaan". 

Manakala Timbalan Presiden PAN Salahuddin Ayub pula pernah menyatakan yang parti serpihan PAS ini tidak akan berganjak dari rancangan untuk melaksanakan hukum hudud di Kelantan dan segala usaha ini tidak akan menimbulkan sebarang masalah di antara DAP dan PAN (NST, 4 Julai 2017).

Samada pendirian Mat Sabu mahupun kenyataan dari Salahuddin, peliknya tidak mendapat sebarang bantahan dari DAP memandangkan tidak ada satu pun kenyataan dari mana-mana pemimpin DAP lantang untuk menentangnya. 

Lagipun perlaksanaan hukum hudud ini adalah usaha PAS dan sebab utama yang menyebabkan DAP memutuskan kerjasama politik adalah apabila Kelantan berjaya meluluskan enakmen hukum syariah. Begitu juga yang berlaku apabila PAS membuat usul pindaan hukum mahkamah syariah baru-baru ini, DAP membisu apabila PAN, PKR dan PPBM menyokong usul PAS ini tetapi memilih untuk menghentam MCA.

Baru-baru ini pula, secara terbuka Kit Siang telah menamakan Husam Musa sebagai MB Kelantan jika Pakatan Harapan berjaya menawan negeri pentadbiran PAS. 

Adalah tepat sekali jika MCA menempelak Kit Siang dan DAP yang masih bekerjasama dengan PAS untuk mempermainkan kepentingan pengundi Cina dalam hasrat mereka berkuasa di Kelantan dan juga Putrajaya.

MCA mengingatkan penyokong-penyokong DAP yang ketika Husam Musa adalah Exco Kelantan di dalam kepimpinan PAS, beliau telah menyokong polisi kerajaan negeri untuk tidak membenarkan peniaga bukan Islam membuka kedai di waktu solat Maghrib. Penyokong DAP juga harus tahu bahawa Husam Musa dan 6 Ahli Parlimen PAN telah menyokong usul Hadi Awang dalam meningkatkan hukuman di Mahkamah Syariah.

Apakah tidak jelas yang DAP sedang bermain wayang dengan pengundi Cina? Di mana kebenarannya yang DAP benar-benar telah memutusakan hubungan politik dengan PAS di atas sebab tidak bersetuju dengan perlakasanaan hukum hudud di Kelantan? Bukankah sepatutnya DAP juga memutuskan hubungan dengan PAN yang jelas menyokong setiap polisi PAS?

Bagi MCA, jika DAP sanggup berbohong dan bermain wayang dengan pengundi Cina, mereka juga tidak akan teragak-agak untuk melakukan yang sama kepada pengundi Melayu. 

Jika di Selangor DAP kekal bersama PAS dalam Pakatan Rakyat dan di Kelantan, DAP tidak membantah PAN yang menyokong hukum hudud, adalah tepat jika MCA melabelkan pemimpin-pemipin DAP terutamanya Kit Siang gemar mengguna politik hipokrasi di mana jua mereka berada untuk terus rakus membohong pengundi dan penyokongnya.

PEMANDU TEKSI SENDIRI DAH TERBAU NIAT 'TOUCH N GO' RAFIZI


Jangan lupa yang Rafizi sendiri pernah mengaku bahawa politiknya adalah politik menghasut dan dalam track rekodnya, apabila sesuatu isu digunakan beliau dan mampu ditelah dan dibuktikan yang beliau bersalah, maka pilihan yang seterusnya adalah mendiamkan dan beralih kepada isu lain umpama kata-kata anak muda, Rafizi ini ibarat 'Touch n Go'.

Baru-baru ini Rafizi telah cuba untuk sekali lagi menghasut pemandu-pemandu teksi di dalam Kongres Himpunan Warga Teksi Malaysia yang dianjurkan oleh PERJIWA dan dihadiri oleh hanya lebih kurang 300 pemandu teksi dari seluruh Malaysia berbanding lebih dari 80,000 pemandu teksi yang ada di Malaysia.

Ini bukan pertama kali Rafizi cuba mendekati pemandu-pemandu teksi untuk kepentingan politik kotornya. Malahan blog ini telah menjejaki hasutan Rafizi sejak 2013 apabila beliau menjadikan Exora sebagai bahan cemuhan untuk pemandu teksi. Inisiatif kerajaan untuk meningkatkan imej dan prestasi perkhidmatan teksi dengan menawarkan Proton Exora yang mempunyai ciri-ciri standard antarabangsa dikatakan memaksa pemandu-pemandu teksi dan membebankan mereka.

Ketika perkhidmatan teksi di Malaysia telah diletakkan sebagai perkhidmatan terburuk di dunia, di mana Rafizi dan apa cadangan pembangkang untuk memulihkan persepsi buruk ini?

Seterusnya, Rafizi sekali lagi cuba membuka mulut menghasut rakyat kerana pihak SPAD telah mencadangkan kepada kerajaan untuk kenaikan tambang pada 2014... DI SINI. Tuduhan semberono dan berniat jahat Rafizi telah dijawab tepat dan bernas oleh mantan Pengerusi SPAD Tan Sri Syed Hamid Albar;

"Bagi pihak SPAD, semakan kenaikan tambang ini akan mengambil kira dua perkara iaitu kemampuan rakyat dan kemampanan industri. Di dalam kajian SPAD akan mengambilkira seandainya tambang terlalu tinggi akan menyebabkan pengguna tidak akan mengguna perkhidmatan pengangkutan awam dan seterusnya sekiranya tambang terlalu rendah, industri pengangkutan tidak akan mampu bertahan dan mereka akan terus bergantung kepada kerajaan."

Apabila gagal menghasut kerana rakyat faham yang industri pengangkutan awam perlu diteruskan kerana melibatkan puluhan ribu nasib rakyat, maka sekali lagi Rafizi terdiam dan seperti biasa juga beliau akan 'Touch and Go'.

Adalah amat malang bagi PERJIWA jika mereka akan terus-terusan bergantung harapan kepada YB 'Touch and Go' seperti Rafizi ini. Sekarang bukan rakyat biasa mahupun penggiat politik yang telah kesan dan mengetahui tujuan jahat Rafizi, ulasan ini datangnya dari salah seorang pemandu teksi sendiri;



Segala yang dibangkitkan Rafizi terutamanya nasib pemandu teksi yang terbelenggu dengan sistem pajak telah pun awal-awal lagi diambil tindakan dan ini buktinya ... DI SINI dan DI SINI. Apa perlu Rafizi ulang apa yang telah pun SPAD lakukan jika bukan hanya untuk sedap mulutnya menghasut?

Walaubagaimanapun, PERJIWA bebas untuk memilih siapa saja untuk mereka mengadu masalah namun apakah YB 'Touch and Go' ini tidak akan mengulangi sikap semulajadinya?

ANWAR HAMMERED DR MAHATHIR THROUGH THE ECONOMIST


To those who are still not aware of The Economist, it is one of Anwar’s international mouthpiece. This England-based and Jewish-owned magazine has always given their support to Anwar on all issues. As of today, the Economist still regards Anwar’s second sodomy conviction as dubious and politically motivated even though he was given ample opportunities to prove his innocence.

It is thus obvious the hugging and handshakes drama in court to show that Anwar has forgiven Dr Mahathir for all his past injustice and persecution towards him, did not last for too long.

When the opposition bloc in Pakatan Harapan began muddled in their scrambling for the top most position between Wan Azizah and Dr Mahathir, Anwar is left with no choice but to barge into the fuss.

This is compounded when Dr Mahathir has expressed his willingness to be appointed as the Prime Minister if Pakatan Harapan wins in GE14.

Apparently, all Anwar’s letters and statements from behind bars are not sufficient enough to stop Dr Mahathir’s political greed.

Hence, the need to hammer Dr Mahathir ought to go beyond the local media coverage and the Economist has begun their propaganda in their latest article titled “Mahathir Mohamad’s return shows the sorry state of Malaysian politics”.

Obviously, The Economist does not favor Dr Mahathir ‘s presence into Pakatan Harapan as it is written as follows;

“What makes all this even tougher to stomach is that Dr Mahathir’s conversion to the opposition’s cause looks disturbingly incomplete. Though he is hobnobbing with former enemies, the old codger still finds it difficult to apologise for the excesses of his tenure” and subsequently blasted with a question if Malaysian’s opposition really finds no more palatable leader.

Despite the fact that the Economist tried to maintain a positive outlook to the cooperation between Dr Mahathir and Pakatan Harapan, but they did not miss to remind their readers of Dr Mahathir’s past tough stance who is well known for governing the nation with his iron fist temper and crafty politics that they can never be eliminated.

The Economist mentioned; “They overlook its crony capitalism and his intolerance for dissent”, “Many of his views remain wacky” and even labeled Dr Mahathir as “a shrewd strategist”.

For the Economist, Dr Mahathir is useful to garner a victory in the coming GE14 and in particular among the rural Malays but there is no reason to offer him the Prime Minister post.

Simultaneously, the Economist is doubtful that the rakyat is convinced the thought of Wan Azizah to warm her jailed husband’s seat as she is not well-functioning as the opposition leader at the moment.

To those who are still not aware of The Economist, it is one of Anwar’s international mouthpiece. This England-based and Jewish-owned magazine has always given their support to Anwar on all issues. As of today, the Economist still regards Anwar’s second sodomy conviction as dubious and politically motivated even though he was given ample opportunities to prove his innocence.
It is thus obvious the hugging and handshakes drama in court to show that Anwar has forgiven Dr Mahathir for all his past injustice and persecution towards him, did not last for too long.
When the opposition bloc in Pakatan Harapan began muddled in their scrambling for the top most position between Wan Azizah and Dr Mahathir, Anwar is left with no choice but to barge into the fuss.
This is compounded when Dr Mahathir has expressed his willingness to be appointed as the Prime Minister if Pakatan Harapan wins in GE14.
Apparently, all Anwar’s letters and statements from behind bars are not sufficient enough to stop Dr Mahathir’s political greed.
Hence, the need to hammer Dr Mahathir ought to go beyond the local media coverage and the Economist has begun their propaganda in their latest article titled “Mahathir Mohamad’s return shows the sorry state of Malaysian politics”.
Obviously, The Economist does not favor Dr Mahathir ‘s presence into Pakatan Harapan as it is written as follows;
“What makes all this even tougher to stomach is that Dr Mahathir’s conversion to the opposition’s cause looks disturbingly incomplete. Though he is hobnobbing with former enemies, the old codger still finds it difficult to apologise for the excesses of his tenure” and subsequently blasted with a question if Malaysian’s opposition really finds no more palatable leader.
Despite the fact that the Economist tried to maintain a positive outlook to the cooperation between Dr Mahathir and Pakatan Harapan, but they did not miss to remind their readers of Dr Mahathir’s past tough stance who is well known for governing the nation with his iron fist temper and crafty politics that they can never be eliminated.
The Economist mentioned; “They overlook its crony capitalism and his intolerance for dissent”, “Many of his views remain wacky” and even labeled Dr Mahathir as “a shrewd strategist”.
For the Economist, Dr Mahathir is useful to garner a victory in the coming GE14 and in particular among the rural Malays but there is no reason to offer him the Prime Minister post.
Simultaneously, the Economist is doubtful that the rakyat is convinced the thought of Wan Azizah to warm her jailed husband’s seat as she is not well-functioning as the opposition leader at the moment.
To those who are still not aware of The Economist, it is one of Anwar’s international mouthpiece. This England-based and Jewish-owned magazine has always given their support to Anwar on all issues. As of today, the Economist still regards Anwar’s second sodomy conviction as dubious and politically motivated even though he was given ample opportunities to prove his innocence. It is thus obvious the hugging and handshakes drama in court to show that Anwar has forgiven Dr Mahathir for all his past injustice and persecution towards him, did not last for too long. When the opposition bloc in Pakatan Harapan began muddled in their scrambling for the top most position between Wan Azizah and Dr Mahathir, Anwar is left with no choice but to barge into the fuss. This is compounded when Dr Mahathir has expressed his willingness to be appointed as the Prime Minister if Pakatan Harapan wins in GE14. Apparently, all Anwar’s letters and statements from behind bars are not sufficient enough to stop Dr Mahathir’s political greed. Hence, the need to hammer Dr Mahathir ought to go beyond the local media coverage and the Economist has begun their propaganda in their latest article titled “Mahathir Mohamad’s return shows the sorry state of Malaysian politics”. Obviously, The Economist does not favor Dr Mahathir ‘s presence into Pakatan Harapan as it is written as follows; “What makes all this even tougher to stomach is that Dr Mahathir’s conversion to the opposition’s cause looks disturbingly incomplete. Though he is hobnobbing with former enemies, the old codger still finds it difficult to apologise for the excesses of his tenure” and subsequently blasted with a question if Malaysian’s opposition really finds no more palatable leader. Despite the fact that the Economist tried to maintain a positive outlook to the cooperation between Dr Mahathir and Pakatan Harapan, but they did not miss to remind their readers of Dr Mahathir’s past tough stance who is well known for governing the nation with his iron fist temper and crafty politics that they can never be eliminated. The Economist mentioned; “They overlook its crony capitalism and his intolerance for dissent”, “Many of his views remain wacky” and even labeled Dr Mahathir as “a shrewd strategist”. For the Economist, Dr Mahathir is useful to garner a victory in the coming GE14 and in particular among the rural Malays but there is no reason to offer him the Prime Minister post. Simultaneously, the Economist is doubtful that the rakyat is convinced the thought of Wan Azizah to warm her jailed husband’s seat as she is not well-functioning as the opposition leader at the moment.

Thursday, July 06, 2017

WSJ DIRTS THAT WILL NOT WORK ANYMORE FOR MALAYSIA


It has been for decades that the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) eyeing for any angle possible to overthrow the UMNO-led government and today even the US politicians admitted that WSJ is selling fake news. For that, Malaysia has extensive experience in disengaging and filter out false news, politically motivated lies and spinning news that is published by the WSJ.


To no surprise, this Israeli-owned mouthpiece aims at UMNO-led government and their leaders for supporting the development of the Malays and other races in the country. WSJ intends to impose their own extreme liberal secular agendas in Malaysia and has shown blatant favoritism towards the opposition since at least 19 years ago.

Make no mistake that WSJ also is an avid supporter of the illegal Iraq war that has destroyed the Middle East, the nation and has resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths and they are directly responsible for the rise of Daesh but as usual, WSJ refuses to take responsibility for their fake news.

Regrettably, many around the world are unaware of the WSJ dirt that works. Malaysia is not alone in discerning their dirty works and apparently many US politicians have come forward to disclose them.

Distortions and twist of facts are words that are often associated with the WSJ. The Democratic senator, Al Franken has clearly slammed WSJ and considered them as deliberately spinning and distorting issues. The Huffington Post has accused WSJ to intentionally misrepresent information to provoke war and economic sanctions on a particular nation. The American Center for Progress also accuses WSJ of knowingly misinforming.

To Salon Magazine, WSJ will initiate a ‘character assassination’ on anyone who refuses to submit to their will. As for Raymond Dalio, an American investor and a philanthropist, he depicts WSJ distortion reports as intentional that it is such an epidemic of sensationalism and commercialism.

Too many people believe in rumors and fake news, and this is what is required to WSJ. WSJ has become a propaganda channel and a vehicle for the oppositions to discredit the government. It has been for too long that WSJ peddling fake news provided by the individual who prefers to see their own country destroyed for their own political interests.
Malaysians must listen to the voices of Americans who perceived WSJ as the false news broadcaster who will deliberately ignore facts in pursuit of their own political party agenda.

As we have long been talking about and knew who are among those leaders in the opposition bloc collaborating with WSJ, do we need to continue trusting and be influenced by their fake news reportings? Do we wish to let the nation’s future to turned into Iraq, Egypt and Syria which are now destroyed by their dirty works?

Wednesday, July 05, 2017

RM209m OR RM177m? GUAN ENG MUST HAVE THE GUTS TO EXPLAIN


When the captain of a fleet has a lot to hide from his crew, expect chaotic situation when they start giving out different directions. Such circumstances have now struck Penang DAP-led. Guan Eng as the head of administration appears to have lost control of his crew that ended up to differ each other.

The conflicting figures regarding the payments of the sea tunnel project cost consultation to Consortium Zenith BUCG Sdn Bhd were discovered when statements made by DAP Padang Kota assemblyman Chow Kon Yeow and DAP Bagan Jermal assemblyman, Lim Hock Seng are shockingly different.

On last June 24, Kon Yeow said the payments made are reported as only RM177.5 million, whereas before it, on May 22, Hock Seng said the amount paid was RM209 million.

The discrepancy of these figures is also Penang DAP’s attempt to defend their arguments for Zenith Construction which is said to be 400 percent higher than the allowed scale.

It seems there is something hidden from public knowledge and how can this happened in the first place. Thus, the Chief Minister of Penang, Lim Guan Eng should come forward to explain the difference between the amount notified by the two DAP MPs.

He should know the truth and he ought to have the guts to come forward instantly to confirm the correct figure. When every day DAP and Guan Eng claimed that their administration practices transparency and upholds integrity in all respects and if they are wrong, dare to admit their mistakes.

There must be a mistake in one of the two figures or perhaps both are wrong. Thus the people of Penang have every right to know the correct answer. In this case, Guan Eng should not play his usual innocent dumb or even try to hold off certain hidden truth just to serve his own agenda.

On last 20 June, the Director of Strategic Communications Barisan Nasional Datuk Seri Abdul Rahman Dahlan has demanded the Penang state government to justify their actions on the paid consultation costs for the construction of the three major tunnel projects which are 400 percent higher than the rates gazetted.

It is even more bizarre when the state government has made full payment while there are still other works related to the project that is yet to be completed.

This is what happens with DAP’s arrogance that they had appointed an external consulting firm when they have deliberately refused to cooperate with JKR. DAP claimed that JKR lacks in expertise but the fact is, JKR has proven to us when they have built roads across the nation without any hassle.

If the DAP government of Penang and Guan Eng is transparent in its administration, the disclosure of the real figure of payments to Zenith is a requirement And do not try to hide from the people’s knowledge.

If the Penang DAP government and Guan Eng are serious and committed to upholding transparency in their administration, the disclosure of the actual amount paid to Zenith is paramount. This is the only way to prove to Penangites that they walk the talk and Barisan Nasional is gravely wrong.


Tuesday, July 04, 2017

AIDIL FITRI IN LONDON, THE GROSS SELFISHNESS OF DR MAHATHIR


PPBM Chairman Dr Mahathir Mohamad’s family celebrating their 1st of Syawal in London invites numerous questions and are condemned by netizens on social media alleging them ignoring the internal fiasco in his party that arises several months ago.

Celebrating Aidil Fitri abroad is not a sin but in terms of the norms of the Malay Muslim community in Malaysia, it is seen as awkward. As a former national leader and now he is the chairman of a political party, Dr Mahathir’s action is quite contrary to portray himself as an icon in strengthening their party.

Dr Mahathir is more than willing leaving the grassroots roaming alone without the chairman. Deservedly, Dr Mahathir and Mukhriz should take this opportunity in conjunction with the Eid celebration for the benefit of their party.

Now it is evident that Mahathir is only concerned about his family and his followers are mere puppets to be manipulated for his personal desires.

Dr Mahathir and his family are said to leave for London a few days before the end of Ramadan and on June 25, a photo of the former UMNO President celebrating Aidil Fitri at the Sofa College Foundation, Acton with the locals and Malaysians went viral in social media.

It is understood that he was accompanied by his children’s families including Marina, Mukhriz and Mokhzani.

And when his family celebrated Eid Fitri abroad, thus highlighting to us that Dr Mahathir and his family are indeed possessing tremendous wealth and his children are filthy rich.

Nevertheless, rumors say that most likely he desperately need space to calm his mind and realign new strategies in his fight in the national politics. Dr Mahathir is not only struggling to go against Barisan Nasional but he is also facing endless political firestorm within Pakatan Harapan.

Therefore he needs to console himself after PH leaders have rejected him as a potential future prime minister.

Notwithstanding the reasons given for his political attempts to bring down Barisan Nasional in the next general election, what is most certain is that Dr Mahathir’s loyalty to the PPBM members is now not only questioned but doubted.

Is it by coincidence that Claire Brown of Sarawak Report who is having a fundraising campaign in London to source legal funds to fend itself from a suit by PAS president Abdul Hadi Awang, that Mahathir finds it fitting to be there as well?

The Sarawak Report operator is undoubtedly cooperating with Dr Mahathir to bring Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak to position himself as Prime Minister. PAS is in the process of suing Clare Brown on charges of receiving RM90 million from UMNO. Will Dr Mahathir not help her?

Let us not forget that Claire Brown is also in London and she is actively raising funds to face PAS suit. Is Dr Mahathir’s presence in London at Aidil Fitri a coincidence?

With all these possibilities, it seems that the opposition attempts to turn Hari Raya conversation with the latest PM Najib’s gossip, seems to have changed focus on Dr Mahathir’s fled to London to celebrate Hari Raya.

Good luck Dr Mahathir and Selamat Hari Raya to everyone.

Monday, July 03, 2017

PPBM ONE SUPER SEAT TO OVERRULE EVERYONE?


Dr Mahathir is still as he used to be even now that he is in the opposition bloc with only one parliamentary seat when making decisions, he will be despotic and always want to be seen with veto power.In the principles of democracy, the party that dominates parliament is eligible to be considered as a candidate for PM. As UMNO has 88 seats in the Barisan Nasional, 13 other component parties will determine the seat distribution and position based on the decision of the meeting.

Article 43 (2a), the Federal Constitution clearly states that the Prime Minister shall be appointed from among the members who have the confidence from majority members of a leading party. PPBM holds only one seat. In any case in the history of the democratic parliamentary system in the world, a party with one seat will be the Prime Minister can only be found in Pakatan Harapan.

Worst still when the opposition shadow cabinet is discussed and later determined in their supporters comments in Malaysiakini. As such, this is not a coalition of democracy but an anarchist alliance.

Zaid Ibrahim of DAP who suggested Dr Mahathir to the Prime Minister post would be a laughing stuff when this former PM is representing a party that has only one parliamentary seat. His suggestion is rather emotional than rational. Perhaps Zaid conveniently unaware that Dr Mahathir is not popular among Pakatan Harapan leaders.

In fact in the upcoming general election, PPBM is expected to be given the least seat when even their members’ total number are kept a secret.

PM Najib Razak is correct to state that it is absurd for PPBM to run for the premiership as they only have one seat as compared to DAP who has the most with 37 seats and followed by PKR with 29. Even PAN holds 5 more seats than PPBM.

When Anwar Ibrahim eventually withdraws himself as PM candidate for Pakatan Harapan, the opposition blocks becomes increasingly haywire and confused. Zaid who is overly excited did not wait too long to continuously promote Dr Mahathir and thus a new shadow cabinet is produced.

Without any meetings or discussions among fellow party components leaders, Zaid just went out with the new shadow cabinet. On what basis and astuteness did Zaid refer to? What the rakyat can conclude, it was just a show off rather than being serious.

The race to name the candidate for the Prime Minister resulted in an unpleasant position and a split among fellow components. That is the very reason why most PH leaders refuse to respond. They are simply fed up.

This is the greatest problem with the opposition block when their crucial internal problems are taken lightly but other party affairs and issues became their utmost interests. Can the rakyat rely on them?

Sunday, July 02, 2017

USD 5 MILLION TO CLINTON FOUNDATION, DR MAHATHIR AND DAIM IN SUDDEN DUMB MODE


It is not as if when an accusation was thrown at Dr Mahathir he would be silent but for Daim, we do not expect any response from him as he is known not to be in the spotlight but rather the hidden hands. The secret that Syed Saddiq leaked to 3 exco Armada PPBM was revealed by Raja Petra in his news portal Malaysia Today has now entered more than 48 hours.

An indictment that Tun Mahathir Mohamad is willing to pay USD 5 million to the Clinton Foundation solely for his political gains and agenda; namely for the US DoJ to announce on a civil suit against 1MDB’s stolen assets are true, it is thus a serious crime and a betrayal to the nation when the prime intention is to oust a democratically elected Prime Minister.

1MDB is no longer an issue as the alleged stolen money are verified by PAC and 1MDB itself as not true. If we blame 1MDB for its bad and incompetent management, it is acceptable. But it is certainly absurd to implicate PM Najib for all the messes when he is not even the decision maker or the cheque signatory.

In the Malaysia Today disclosure, the recent US DoJ announcement was planned and led by Dr Mahathir and Daim that a handsome amount of USD 5 million was contributed to Clinton Foundation.

They have even planned the subsequent measures once the issue explodes whereby statements after statements from the opposition quarters will fill the media space and in particular as Syawal is arriving, all Muslims will be served with this recent hot topic as the main dish instead of ketupat and rendang.

This exposed conspiracy plot proves that Dr Mahathir is funding foreign parties for his political interests, but we still have doubts from which sources he earned the money? Is the money from his billionaire children or his own hard income which he accumulates himself during his so-called ‘clean’ administration or perhaps that money are forced from his cronies?

Next, is this how Dr Mahathir and the opposition block claims to save Malaysia?

At least Dr Mahathir and Daim will defend his Ketua Armada Syed Saddiq after lodging a police report against Raja Petra. Alas, both are still keeping dumb. 

However, no statement comes from PPBM too. In fact with such allegation, then all the claims from the Armada Exco on Dr Mahathir’s wealth and his children are now been answered.

Saturday, July 01, 2017

MALAYSIA DESERVES TO KNOW THE TRAITOR OF THE STATE


Both civil suits by the US Department of Justice (DoJ) are to recover assets allegedly siphoned from 1MDB.

It seems that the DoJ’s reputation continues to be a joke to the world as they link the recent allegations against 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) which is not based on facts and not proven in court first.

On the part of Malaysia through the Public Accounts Committee (PAC), we have been conducting a thorough investigation and found no evidence of 1MDB misappropriated funds as claimed by the US DoJ.

Those seditious statements of the US DoJ were immediately issued without any basis and strong evidence just to influence the general public and in particular Malaysians who are easily deceived into believing something without being first investigated.

Without even examining its facts, those statements are now manipulated as the main subject for individuals and certain political parties for their personal gains. To be specific, their intentions are to tarnish the nation image and its administration.

Even though the US Department of Justice has the right to file a civil suit, it is paramount for each suit based on facts which can be substantiated and the allegations made need to be proven in court. Hence, Malaysia has given sufficient space for other countries to conduct their investigations in accordance with their legislation.

But Malaysia will never submit to the dictates of other countries and will carry out the investigation in accordance with its own laws.

In fact, it should not be sticking to rhetorics with an unfounded basis for malice intentions. The US DoJ act seems to be motivated or incited by quarters who are envious of our nation’s peace and prosperity enjoyed by the rakyat.

Therefore, with the US DoJ’s kind intention of returning 1MDB’s assets, they should reveal who the real instigators or complainants are who have malicious intent to threaten the country’s administration.

Malaysia deserves the right to know who the complainants are and the US Department of Justice should disclose their identity into verifying if the complainants are associated and involved with the opposition agenda to the coup from the ruling party and damage PM Najib’s leadership who are democratically elected.

Unless and until the US DoJ revealed the instigator or complainant names, Malaysians have every reason not to trust their biased claims as we are more than prepared to face such despicable actions from foreigners.

Source : PRU14
Both civil suits by the US Department of Justice (DoJ) are to recover assets allegedly siphoned from 1MDB.
It seems that the DoJ’s reputation continues to be a joke to the world as they link the recent allegations against 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) which is not based on facts and not proven in court first.
On the part of Malaysia through the Public Accounts Committee (PAC), we have been conducting a thorough investigation and found no evidence of 1MDB misappropriated funds as claimed by the US DoJ.
Those seditious statements of the US DoJ were immediately issued without any basis and strong evidence just to influence the general public and in particular Malaysians who are easily deceived into believing something without being first investigated.
Without even examining its facts, those statements are now manipulated as the main subject for individuals and certain political parties for their personal gains. To be specific, their intentions are to tarnish the nation image and its administration.
Even though the US Department of Justice has the right to file a civil suit, it is paramount for each suit based on facts which can be substantiated and the allegations made need to be proven in court. Hence, Malaysia has given sufficient space for other countries to conduct their investigations in accordance with their legislation.
But Malaysia will never submit to the dictates of other countries and will carry out the investigation in accordance with its own laws.
In fact, it should not be sticking to rhetorics with an unfounded basis for malice intentions. The US DoJ act seems to be motivated or incited by quarters who are envious of our nation’s peace and prosperity enjoyed by the rakyat.
Therefore, with the US DoJ’s kind intention of returning 1MDB’s assets, they should reveal who the real instigators or complainants are who have malicious intent to threaten the country’s administration.
Malaysia deserves the right to know who the complainants are and the US Department of Justice should disclose their identity into verifying if the complainants are associated and involved with the opposition agenda to the coup from the ruling party and damage PM Najib’s leadership who are democratically elected.
Unless and until the US DoJ revealed the instigator or complainant names, Malaysians have every reason not to trust their biased claims as we are more than prepared to face such despicable actions from foreigners.
Both civil suits by the US Department of Justice (DoJ) are to recover assets allegedly siphoned from 1MDB. It seems that the DoJ’s reputation continues to be a joke to the world as they link the recent allegations against 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) which is not based on facts and not proven in court first. On the part of Malaysia through the Public Accounts Committee (PAC), we have been conducting a thorough investigation and found no evidence of 1MDB misappropriated funds as claimed by the US DoJ. Those seditious statements of the US DoJ were immediately issued without any basis and strong evidence just to influence the general public and in particular Malaysians who are easily deceived into believing something without being first investigated. Without even examining its facts, those statements are now manipulated as the main subject for individuals and certain political parties for their personal gains. To be specific, their intentions are to tarnish the nation image and its administration. Even though the US Department of Justice has the right to file a civil suit, it is paramount for each suit based on facts which can be substantiated and the allegations made need to be proven in court. Hence, Malaysia has given sufficient space for other countries to conduct their investigations in accordance with their legislation. But Malaysia will never submit to the dictates of other countries and will carry out the investigation in accordance with its own laws. In fact, it should not be sticking to rhetorics with an unfounded basis for malice intentions. The US DoJ act seems to be motivated or incited by quarters who are envious of our nation’s peace and prosperity enjoyed by the rakyat. Therefore, with the US DoJ’s kind intention of returning 1MDB’s assets, they should reveal who the real instigators or complainants are who have malicious intent to threaten the country’s administration. Malaysia deserves the right to know who the complainants are and the US Department of Justice should disclose their identity into verifying if the complainants are associated and involved with the opposition agenda to the coup from the ruling party and damage PM Najib’s leadership who are democratically elected. Unless and until the US DoJ revealed the instigator or complainant names, Malaysians have every reason not to trust their biased claims as we are more than prepared to face such despicable actions from foreigners.

US DoJ SHOULD MIND YOUR OWN BUSINESS


The latest US Department of Justice (DoJ) announcement on 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) does not focus on key issues in which the alleged crimes are committed in the United States of America but they merely quoted complaints that they have received.

Whatever is happening internally in Malaysia, and the greater part of their claims have no connection with the subject of whether the crime was committed in the United States itself.

The latest US Department of Justice (DoJ) announcement on 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) does not focus on key issues in which the alleged crimes are committed in the United States of America but they merely quoted complaints that they have received. Whatever is happening internally in Malaysia, and the greater part of their claims have no connection with the subject of whether the crime was committed in the United States itself.

Malaysia does not need foreign intervention including DoJ in administering the country as we have always adopted a policy respecting the Principle and the Constitution of others as it is implemented and practiced at present.
If the American government does not want to be a joke of the century to the world, it is best that the US DoJ … JUST MIND YOUR OWN BUSINESS!
Malaysia does not need foreign intervention including DoJ in administering the country as we have always adopted a policy respecting the Principle and the Constitution of others as it is implemented and practiced at present. If the American government does not want to be a joke of the century to the world, it is best that the US DoJ … JUST MIND YOUR OWN BUSINESS!
Malaysia does not need foreign intervention including DoJ in administering the country as we have always adopted a policy respecting the Principle and the Constitution of others as it is implemented and practiced at present.

If the American government does not want to be a joke of the century to the world, it is best that the US DoJ … JUST MIND YOUR OWN BUSINESS!
Malaysia does not need foreign intervention including DoJ in administering the country as we have always adopted a policy respecting the Principle and the Constitution of others as it is implemented and practiced at present. If the American government does not want to be a joke of the century to the world, it is best that the US DoJ … JUST MIND YOUR OWN BUSINESS!

Full article can be read ... HERE
The latest US Department of Justice (DoJ) announcement on 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) does not focus on key issues in which the alleged crimes are committed in the United States of America but they merely quoted complaints that they have received.
Whatever is happening internally in Malaysia, and the greater part of their claims have no connection with the subject of whether the crime was committed in the United States itself.
The latest US Department of Justice (DoJ) announcement on 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) does not focus on key issues in which the alleged crimes are committed in the United States of America but they merely quoted complaints that they have received. Whatever is happening internally in Malaysia, and the greater part of their claims have no connection with the subject of whether the crime was committed in the United States itself.
The latest US Department of Justice (DoJ) announcement on 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) does not focus on key issues in which the alleged crimes are committed in the United States of America but they merely quoted complaints that they have received.
Whatever is happening internally in Malaysia, and the greater part of their claims have no connection with the subject of whether the crime was committed in the United States itself.
The latest US Department of Justice (DoJ) announcement on 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) does not focus on key issues in which the alleged crimes are committed in the United States of America but they merely quoted complaints that they have received. Whatever is happening internally in Malaysia, and the greater part of their claims have no connection with the subject of whether the crime was committed in the United States itself.
The latest US Department of Justice (DoJ) announcement on 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) does not focus on key issues in which the alleged crimes are committed in the United States of America but they merely quoted complaints that they have received.
Whatever is happening internally in Malaysia, and the greater part of their claims have no connection with the subject of whether the crime was committed in the United States itself.
The latest US Department of Justice (DoJ) announcement on 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) does not focus on key issues in which the alleged crimes are committed in the United States of America but they merely quoted complaints that they have received. Whatever is happening internally in Malaysia, and the greater part of their claims have no connection with the subject of whether the crime was committed in the United States itself.
The latest US Department of Justice (DoJ) announcement on 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) does not focus on key issues in which the alleged crimes are committed in the United States of America but they merely quoted complaints that they have received.
Whatever is happening internally in Malaysia, and the greater part of their claims have no connection with the subject of whether the crime was committed in the United States itself.
The latest US Department of Justice (DoJ) announcement on 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) does not focus on key issues in which the alleged crimes are committed in the United States of America but they merely quoted complaints that they have received. Whatever is happening internally in Malaysia, and the greater part of their claims have no connection with the subject of whether the crime was committed in the United States itself.
The latest US Department of Justice (DoJ) announcement on 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) does not focus on key issues in which the alleged crimes are committed in the United States of America but they merely quoted complaints that they have received.
Whatever is happening internally in Malaysia, and the greater part of their claims have no connection with the subject of whether the crime was committed in the United States itself.
The latest US Department of Justice (DoJ) announcement on 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) does not focus on key issues in which the alleged crimes are committed in the United States of America but they merely quoted complaints that they have received. Whatever is happening internally in Malaysia, and the greater part of their claims have no connection with the subject of whether the crime was committed in the United States itself.